Moreover, if it had to impose a ban, the government could have only done so through legislation and not by merely issuing a ‘resolution’.S.. Sonak on Friday granted interim stay on implementation of the ban till June 30. Waghela and Justice M.However, soon after the order Distillers Association of Maharashtra and the All India Plastic Manufacturers Association among others filed petitions in the high court, challenging the ban. However, the court stayed the ban for a temporary period.Claiming that selling liquor in bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate is a health hazard, the government had issued a Government Resolution (GR) banning the sale of alcohol in plastic bottles.A cosmetic jar division bench of Chief Justice D. The court posted the petitions for hearing on June 14. As per the GR, the ban was supposed to come into effect from Friday.H. The petitions claimed that the government could not impose such a ban, as sale of liquor in a particular make of bottles is governed under the FSSA Act.The Bombay high court on Friday granted an interim stay till June 30 on implementation of the government of Maharashtra’s order banning the sale of liquor in plastic bottles across the state
留言列表
